I live in a household that still "takes" a printed newspaper - actually two: the Chicago Tribune and our local community weekly, The Landmark.
The local paper keeps us up to date with weekend events, house prices, town and school government gossip. We always read (and recycle) it within 24 hours. But in eight years, I've only gone to the Landmark's website a few times.

We have a different relationship with the Chicago Tribune.
Here's a typical day: Before 7 a.m., someone in our family walks the 50 feet out to the end of the driveway to get the Trib, without a coat most days. (I wear a coat.) My husband looks for work-related stories, checking to see if his own quotes made it into print, and he opens to the comics. Both kids read (and discuss) the comics, pointing out funny Dilberts to me. The older one checks the front page looking for a story that will get him extra credit in Western Civ. I flip through the front section quickly.
Both of us rely on the Trib website (and alerts) for breaking news. One of us is on the site constantly, and the other checks it at least once per day, sometimes through the iPad. You could say we're fairly immersed in the brand.

Over the last six months, the Trib is clearly trying to find a sustainable digital strategy. I'm not sure how well it's working.
Last winter, the Trib announced its Printer's Row Journal, sent me a few print issues, invited me into its fledgling online community, then asked me to pay for it. We're a bookish family, we were interested, until we saw the pricetag - $99 a year for current print subscribers, just to get the print and digital edition delivered weekly. No way. The Trib doesn't have enough credibility around book reviews to ask us to pay that price.
Half a year later, they added free tickets to the Printer's Row events and a discount on purchases, and offered the booklet/digital edition for just $49 a year - to current print subscribers. Digital only is $29 a year. Not for us. Although I do know a family where the 80+ year-old parents take the print and the 40ish kids take the digital.
Then in June, the Trib launched a new website and reports 80,000 registered users in 4 months.
But as of November 1, like many other papers, the Trib put a paywall up on its website. Seven-day print subscribers get unlimited access - if you know your password. They'll let you read 5 premium stories a month for free.
A few weeks ago, we started receiving the digital edition of the Trib. We didn't ask for it, we don't pay for it. We took a look. It is literally just the digital edition of the daily printed paper. We'd rather go online and browse the website, which is part of why we never opened the digital edition again. The main reason we'll never open it? It comes at 6:15 p.m. That's more than 12 hours after I've seen the print edition and I've already been to the site a few times that day.
I understand the rationale behind extending a product line and searching for new revenue opportunities, especially as audiences move online. As a consumer with a relationship and fairly heavy print and digital engagement with this brand, I'm confused. I'm worried that instead of offering several ways to reach audiences in more formats, the Trib is going to push me where I don't want to go. I can get my news elsewhere, online or mobile.
Are you bundling all your print, online, digital, tablet space in newspaper brands into one buy?
Are you (and your clients) placing any value on the digital editions, or are they just thrown in?
Are you using the space in different formats for different objectives?